Skip to main content
. 1999 Nov 1;19(21):9385–9398. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-21-09385.1999

Table 2.

Electrophysiological properties of RA projection neurons

Stimulus– response function (mV · msec−1 · μA−1) Response threshold (μA) RInput (MΩ) Baseline firing rate (Hz) Current–frequency relation (Hz/nA) Accommodation rate (@400 pA, Hz/ISI) Spontaneous EPSC amplitude (<30 pA), pA Spontaneous EPSC frequency (Hz) RSeries(MΩ)
Fledgling 89  ± 14 9.2 54.7  ± 7.3 −0.93  ± 0.13
(n = 7) (1) (6) (4)
Juvenile 0.070  ± 0.017 217  ± 51 86  ± 7 12.0  ± 0.8 67.3  ± 3.5 −0.44  ± 0.05 8.9  ± 0.1 0.27  ± 0.06 20.8  ± 0.5
*p < 0.01a (2013 events  from 14 cells)
(n = 12) (12) (21) (13) (23) (18) (13) (13)
Adult 0.178  ± 0.051 58  ± 16 91  ± 15 15.3  ± 2.0 70.8  ± 3.4 −0.39  ± 0.06
**p < 0.05a **p < 0.02a *p < 0.04b *p < 0.01a
(n= 8) (8) (9) (9) (19) (14)
LMAN-lesioned juvenile 0.169  ± 0.035 85  ± 20 82  ± 7 11.7  ± 0.6 70.9  ± 4.5 −0.50  ± 0.08 9.8  ± 0.1 0.32  ± 0.12 21.1  ± 0.5
**p< 0.01a **p < 0.04a **p< 0.0001a
(n= 13) (13) (18) (9) (19) (18) (1692 events  from 8 cells) (7) (7)

All values: mean ± SEM. *Versus fledgling; **versus juvenile control; statistically significant differences inbold.

F2-a

Mann–Whitney U test: used when one or more of the distributions under comparison was significantly non-normal based on the Shapiro-Wilk test.

F2-b

Two-tailed Student's t test assuming equal variance: used when both distributions were normal and their variances equal.