Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neurocomputing (Amst). 2019 Feb 7;335:34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.103

Table 2.

Dice (%) and ASSD (mm) evaluation of 3D brain tumor segmentation with different training and testing methods. Tr −Aug: Training without data augmentation. Tr + Aug: Training with data augmentation. W-Net is a 2.5D network and W-Net (ASC) denotes the fusion of axial, sagittal and coronal views according to [43]. * denotes significant improvement from the baseline of single prediction in Tr −Aug and Tr + Aug respectively (p-value < 0.05). † denotes significant improvement from Tr −Aug with TTA + TTD (p-value < 0.05).

Train Test Dice (%)
ASSD (mm)
WNet (ASC) 3D U-Net V-Net WNet (ASC) 3D U-Net V-Net
Tr − Aug Baseline 87.81 ± 7.27 87.26 ± 7.73 86.84 ± 8.38 2.04 ± 1.27 2.62 ± 1.48 2.86 ± 1.79
TTD 88.14 ± 7.02 87.55 ± 7.33 87.13 ± 8.14 1.95 ± 1.20 2.55 ± 1.41 2.82 ± 1.75
TTA 89.16 ± 6.48* 88.58 ± 6.50* 87.86 ± 6.97* 1.42 ± 0.93* 1.79 ± 1.16* 1.97 ± 1.40*
TTA + TTD 89.43 ± 6.14* 88.75 ± 6.34* 88.03 ± 6.56* 1.37 ± 0.89* 1.72 ± 1.23* 1.95 ± 1.31*
Tr + Aug Baseline 88.76 ± 5.76 88.43 ± 6.67 87.44 ± 7.84 1.61 ± 1.12 1.82 ± 1.17 2.07 ± 1.46
TTD 88.92 ± 5.73 88.52 ± 6.66 87.56 ± 7.78 1.57 ± 1.06 1.76 ± 1.14 1.99 ± 1.33
TTA 90.07 ± 5.69* 89.41 ± 6.05* 88.38 ± 6.74* 1.13 ± 0.54* 1.45 ± 0.81 1.67 ± 0.98*
TTA + TTD 90.35 ± 5.64*† 89.60 ± 5.95*† 88.57 ± 6.32*† 1.10 ± 0.49* 1.39 ± 0.76*† 1.62 ± 0.95*†