Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2019 Jul 16;119:386–400. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.003

Table 5.

Participant-Specific Model Results: Retrieval Practice and Spacing Effects at Retention Test

Participant 1
Fixed Effects Coef. SE Z p
 Intercept 1.25 0.30
Retrieval Practice Effect
 Repetitiona −1.11 0.32 −3.44 .001
Spacing Effect
 Spacedb 0.05 0.32 0.16 .875
Participant 2
Fixed Effects Coef. SE Z p
 Intercept 0.27 0.25
Retrieval Practice Effect
 Repetitiona −0.63 0.29 −2.15 .031
Spacing Effect
 Spacedb 0.21 0.29 0.73 .466
Participant 3
Fixed Effects Coef. SE Z p
 Intercept −1.50 0.33
Retrieval Practice Effect
 Repetitiona 0.42 0.33 1.28 .199
Spacing Effect
 Spacedb 0.63 0.33 1.91 .056
Participant 4
Fixed Effects Coef. SE Z p
 Intercept 0.39 0.26
Retrieval Practice Effect
 Repetitiona −1.56 0.32 −4.93 <.001
Spacing Effect
 Spacedb 0.44 0.31 1.39 .165

Note. Excluding the intercepts, Coef. = model estimation of the change in response accuracy (in log odds) from the reference category for each fixed effect; SE = standard error of the estimate; Z = Wald Z test statistic, two-tailed.

a

Reference is retrieval practice condition.

b

Reference is massed condition.