P-value	0.002
Number of Groups	5
F	6.52
R-squared	0.58
Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test	Mean Difference	q	Significance	95% CI of difference
0 nM vs 3.75 nM Dip1	0.049	1.48	ns	−0.092 to 0.19
0 nM vs 7.5 nM Dip1	0.031	1.03	ns	−0.097 to 0.16
0 nM vs 15 nM Dip1	0.12	3.86	ns	−0.012 to 0.25
0 nM vs 75 nM Dip1	0.20	6.19	**	0.064 to 0.35
3.75 nM vs 7.5 nM Dip1	−0.018	0.59	ns	−0.15 to 0.11
3.75 nM vs 15 nM Dip1	0.068	2.24	ns	−0.061 to 0.20
3.75 nM vs 75 nM Dip1	0.16	4.71	*	0.015 to 0.30
7.5 nM vs 15 nM Dip1	0.086	3.17	ns	−0.029 to 0.20
7.5 nM vs 75 nM Dip1	0.17	5.75	**	0.045 to 0.30
15 nM vs 75 nM Dip1	0.088	2.92	ns	−0.040 to 0.22

One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test results for the data in Figure 1 panel B. For significance, “ns”, “*” and “**” corresponds to a p-values of > 0.05, ≤ 0.05 and ≤ 0.01, respectively.