Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2019 Sep 26;29(19):3331–3338.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.023
P-value 0.851
Number of Groups 5
F 0.33
R-squared 0.07
Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test Mean Difference q Significance 95% CI of difference
0 nM vs 3.75 nM Dip1 0.00043 0.46 ns −0.0036 to 0.0044
0 nM vs 7.5 nM Dip1 0.00025 0.29 ns −0.0034 to 0.0039
0 nM vs 15 nM Dip1 −0.0000077 0.01 ns −0.0037 to 0.0036
0 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 0.0013 1.35 ns −0.0027 to 0.0053
3.75 nM vs 7.5 nM Dip1 −0.00018 0.21 ns −0.0038 to 0.0035
3.75 nM vs 15 nM Dip1 −0.00044 0.51 ns −0.0041 to 0.0032
3.75 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 0.00084 0.89 ns −0.0032 to 0.0048
7.5 nM vs 15 nM Dip1 −0.00026 0.34 ns −0.0035 to 0.0030
7.5 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 0.0010 1.19 ns −0.0026 to 0.0047
15 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 0.0013 1.49 ns −0.0024 to 0.0049

One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test results for the data in Figure 1 panel F.