P-value | 0.851 | |||
Number of Groups | 5 | |||
F | 0.33 | |||
R-squared | 0.07 | |||
Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test | Mean Difference | q | Significance | 95% CI of difference |
0 nM vs 3.75 nM Dip1 | 0.00043 | 0.46 | ns | −0.0036 to 0.0044 |
0 nM vs 7.5 nM Dip1 | 0.00025 | 0.29 | ns | −0.0034 to 0.0039 |
0 nM vs 15 nM Dip1 | −0.0000077 | 0.01 | ns | −0.0037 to 0.0036 |
0 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 | 0.0013 | 1.35 | ns | −0.0027 to 0.0053 |
3.75 nM vs 7.5 nM Dip1 | −0.00018 | 0.21 | ns | −0.0038 to 0.0035 |
3.75 nM vs 15 nM Dip1 | −0.00044 | 0.51 | ns | −0.0041 to 0.0032 |
3.75 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 | 0.00084 | 0.89 | ns | −0.0032 to 0.0048 |
7.5 nM vs 15 nM Dip1 | −0.00026 | 0.34 | ns | −0.0035 to 0.0030 |
7.5 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 | 0.0010 | 1.19 | ns | −0.0026 to 0.0047 |
15 nM vs 75 nM Dip1 | 0.0013 | 1.49 | ns | −0.0024 to 0.0049 |
One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test results for the data in Figure 1 panel F.