Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;9:14414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51034-x

Table 2.

Conditional fixed-effects logistic regression model for delayed disengagement with both face and non-face trials included for each dataset.

Delayed disengagement Finland, N = 681 DTs, 30 participants, Pseudo R2 = 0.25 Malawi 1, N = 715 DTs, 35 participants, Pseudo R2 = 0.37 Malawi 2, N = 7,442 DTs, 358 participants, Pseudo R2 = 0.46 South Africa, N = 2,600 DTs, 147 participants, Pseudo R2 = 0.18
Odds ratio (95% CI) P Odds ratio (95% CI) P Odds ratio (95% CI) P Odds ratio (95% CI) P
Trial was face instead of non-face pattern 18.60 (9.12, 37.93) <0.001 39.45 (21.02, 74.04) <0.001 86.65 (68.49, 109.63) <0.001 10.49 (7.93, 13.88) <0.001
Previous trial was invalid 1.15 (0.64, 2.09) 0.64 1.14 (0.69, 1.88) 0.60 1.15 (0.97, 1.37) 0.12 0.94 (0.74, 1.20) 0.63
Lateral stimulus was on the left 0.86 (0.55, 1.34) 0.51 0.91 (0.61, 1.36) 0.66 0.76 (0.67, 0.87) 0.003 1.12 (0.91, 1.37) 0.29
First face of a block 0.57 (0.14, 2.22) 0.41 0.77 (0.29, 2.03) 0.60 1.61 (1.18, 2.21) <0.001 0.73 (0.45, 1.21) 0.23
Trial number in a block 0.97 (0.87, 1.07) 0.56 0.90 (0.81, 0.99) 0.03 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) <0.001 0.99 (0.94, 1.04) 0.64
Block:
        1 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A
        2 1.36 (0.76, 2.44) 0.30 0.94 (0.54, 1.62) 0.54 1.10 (0.92, 1.33) 0.31 0.73 (0.55, 0.97) 0.03
        3 0.72 (0.38, 1.36) 0.31 0.88 (0.51, 1.54) 0.51 1.10 (0.91, 1.32) 0.32 0.84 (0.63, 1.12) 0.23
        4 0.86 (0.45, 1.63) 0.64 0.95 (0.53, 1.71) 0.53 1.66 (1.36, 2.02) <0.001 0.79 (0.58, 1.08) 0.14