Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;85(10):2332–2340. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14047

Table 2.

Area under the curve (AUC) of [14C]midazolam and [14C]1‐hydroxy‐midazolam after administration of a microdose or microtracer [14C]midazolam, presented as median (range)

Total (n = 15) Microdose (n = 9) Microtracer (n = 6) Mann–Whitney U microdose vs microtracer group (P‐value)
[ 14 C]midazolam
AUC0–t (ng L−1 *h) 46.77 (32.42–196.77) 46.77 (32.42–196.77) 48.28 (39.17–81.40) .86
AUC0–∞ (ng L−1 *h) 48.90 (34.15–218.80) (n = 14a) 48.90 (34.15–218.80) (n = 8a) 49.11 (39.75–82.45) .66
[ 14 C]1‐hydroxy‐midazolam
AUC0–t (ng L−1 *h) 10.89 (5.28–24.21) 10.19 (5.28–24.21) 11.20 (5.84–19.93) .86
AUC0–∞ (ng L−1 *h) 12.39 (5.99–26.41) (n = 14a) 13.14 (7.40–26.41) (n = 8a) 12.39 (5.99–26.27) .95
[ 14 C]1‐hydroxy‐midazolam/ [ 14 C]midazolam
AUC0–t ratiob 0.23 (0.11–0.51) 0.23 (0.11–0.49) 0.21 (0.13–0.51) .69
a

for 1 subject this parameter could not be established as there were only 2 plasma samples available.

b

AUC0–t ratio = [14C]1‐hydroxy‐midazolam AUC0–t/[14C]midazolam AUC0–t