Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 31;85(10):2244–2254. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14051

Table 2.

Comparative assessment of budesonide‐MMX and mesalamine in active, mild‐to‐moderate UC

A. Induction of clinical and endoscopic remission
Budesonide‐MMX
0.97 (0.59–1.60) Mesalamine >2.4 g/day
1.23 (0.76–2.01) 1.27 (1.03–1.56) Mesalamine 1.6–2.4 g/day
2.68 (1.75–4.10) 2.75 (1.94–3.90) 2.17 (1.55–3.05) Placebo
B. Serious adverse events
Budesonide‐MMX
1.85 (0.59–5.79) Mesalamine >2.4 g/day
1.44 (0.52–3.97) 0.78 (0.40–1.51) Mesalamine 1.6–2.4 g/day
1.35 (0.60–3.04) 0.73 (0.29–1.82) 0.94 (0.43–2.04) Placebo
C. Treatment discontinuations or withdrawals from the study due to adverse events
Budesonide‐MMX
2.22 (1.23–4.02) Mesalamine >2.4 g/day
1.71 (0.98–2.96) 0.77 (0.52–1.14) Mesalamine 1.6–2.4 g/day
0.92 (0.61–1.38) 0.41 (0.26–0.66) 0.54 (0.34–0.84) Placebo

The column‐defining treatment is compared with the row‐defining treatment. The estimates in the cells are odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. For induction of clinical and endoscopic remission, ORs >1.0 favour the treatment in the left upper square. On the opposite, for safety outcomes (serious adverse events and withdrawals from the study due to adverse events), ORs <1.0 favour the treatment in the left upper square. Statistically significant results are shown in bold.

UC, ulcerative colitis.