Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;8(3):133. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030133

Table 1.

Summary of Streptomyces strains used for ribosome engineering.

Antibiotic Strain Method Mutation a (Fold)/(g/L) b Year/Ref.
Actinorhodin (23) S. coelicolor Str, Tet - c - 1996 [15]
S. coelicolor Str K88E 15 (2.8 OD600) 1997 [25]
S. coelicolor Par P91S 5–21 (2.1 OD600) 2000 [26]
S. coelicolor Str, Gen, Rif K88E 48 (6.88 OD633) 2001 [27]
S. coelicolor relA and relC mutants
Rif
Q424L >93 (2.79 OD633) 2002 [28]
S. coelicolor Str, Rif, Par, Gen - 180 (1.63) 2008 [29]
S. coelicolor Str R86P 55–106 (0.1338 ± 0.007) 2009 [30]
S. lividans Ery - 6–8 (0.3) 2012 [31]
S. coelicolor Rif S433L 42–55.5 (28.7 ± 1.3) 2013 [32]
Actinomycin D (9) S. antibioticus Str - 5.2 (0.063) 1998 [33]
S.antibioticus Gen - 4.1 (0.05) 2008 [34]
S. parvulus Str K88R 2–10 (0.0328 ± 0.0086) 2009 [30]
S. antibioticus Str K88R 7–10 (0.0471 ± 0.0044) 2009 [30]
S. parvulus Rif D427V 1–2.2 (0.010 ± 0.001) 2013 [32]
S. antibioticus Rif H437R 5–11 (0.086 ± 0.016) 2013 [32]
Avermectins (3,4) S. avermitilis frr overexpression - 3–3.7 (>0.8) 2010 [35]
Avilamycin (5) S. viridochromogenes 60Co γ-ray, GS, Str K43N 36.8 (1.4) 2013 [36]
Chloramphenicol (21) S. coelicolor Str, Rif, HE - 20–40 (−) 2011 [37]
Congocidine S. coelicolor Str, Rif, HE - 20–40 (−) 2011 [37]
Daptomycin (7) S. roseosporus Ple - 1.3 (>0.08) 2013 [38]
S. roseosporus Neo, Gen, Rif, Par, GS a - 4 (0.324) 2018 [39]
A21978C S. roseosporus Str, Reporter gene K43N 2.2 (>0.12) 2012 [40]
Formycin A (28) S. lavendulae Str - 5.2 (0.13) 1998 [33]
S. lavendulae Str R440H 2.4–4.6 (0.055 ± 0.014) 2013 [32]
Fredericamycin A (15) S. chattanoogensis Str - 26 (0.26) 1998 [33]
S. somaliensis Rif R444H 3 (0.6795 ± 0.0158) 2015 [41]
Milbemycin (19,20) S. bingchenggensis CM, Str, UV - 1.8 (1.45) 2009 [42]
Nosiheptide (1) S. actuosus 60Coγ-irradiation, LiCl, Str, GS K88R 9.2 (1.54) 2014 [43]
Oligomycin (26) S. avermitilis Str K43M 20–40 (1.064) 2009 [30]
Rimocidin (30) S. rimosus Gen, Rif - 2.5–6.2 (0.6731) 2019 [44]
Salinomycin (6) S. albus Str, Gen, Rif - 2.3 (25) 2003 [45]
Sinefungin (27) S. incarnatus Rif, L-Arg D427G 35 (>0.05) 2010 [46]
Streptomycin (10) S. griseus Gen - 10 (0.3) 2008 [34]
S. griseus Rif Q424K 2.4–6.0 (0.178 ± 0.027) 2013 [32]
Tiancimycin A (17) S. sp. CB03234 Rif L422P 40 (0.0225 ± 0.0031) 2016 [47]
2018 [48]
S. sp. CB03234 Str K43N 45 (0.0137 ± 0.0003) 2019 [49]
Tiancimycins D (14) S. sp. CB03234 Str K43N 109 (0.0192 ± 0.0004) 2019 [49]
Toyocamycin (16) S. diastatochromogenes frr overexpression - 1.46 (>0.6) 2014 [50]
S. diastatochromogenes Rif H437Y 4.5 (0.68) 2016 [51]
Virginiamycin (2) S. virginiae UV, GS, Str - 11.6 (0.251) 2018 [52]
6′-Deoxy-bleomycin Z (12) S. flavoviridis UV, Str, Gen, Rif - 7 (0.07) 2018 [53]

The abbreviations are as follows: GS, genome shuffling; HE, heterologous gene expression; CM, chemical mutation; HEE, high energy electron; HT, high throughput. The abbreviations Ple, Neo, Ery, Gen, Kan, Lin, Par, Rif, Str, and Tet indicate resistance to pleuromutilin, neomycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, lincomycin, paromomycin, rifampicin, streptomycin, and tetracycline, respectively. a The strains with the highest titer of rpoB and rpsL mutation. b The term “fold“ was defined as the increased yield of the mutant strain compared to its parental strain, which was recalculated based on the cited articles. c The highest yield strain has no detected mutation within the rpoB and rpsL gene.