Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 30;9(3):84. doi: 10.3390/bios9030084

Table 1.

A comparison of different biosensor techniques for tau detection.

Techniques Modified Linear Rang LOD Target Ref.
Fluorescence FAM/ssDNA - 28 nM Tau441 [10]
SPR aptamer/tau/anti-tau/
MUA
10–100 fM 10 fM Tau381 [17]
tau/mAb/protein G 0.01–100 ng/mL 10 pg/mL Tau441 [18]
tau/anti-tau/11-MUA 10–2000 pg/mL 2.4 pg/mL T-tau [19]
Electrochemistry tau/anti-tau/pPG/GO 0.5–15.1 nM 0.15 nM T-tau [13]
tau/anti-tau/protein G/
DTSSP
10−14–10−7 M 0.03 pM Tau441 [14]
CS-Au-Aptamer/tau/anti-tau/MPA 0.5–100.0 pM 0.42 pM Tau381 [20]
tau/tau 0.2–1.0 μM - Tau441 [15]
tau/anti-tau/MPA-
SAM
103–105 pg/mL - T-tau [16]

FAM: 5-Carboxyfluorescein; MUA: 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid; pPG: poly (propyleneglycol); GO: graphene oxide; DTSSP: 3, 3’-dithiobis (sulfosuccinimidyl propionate); CS: cysteamine; MPA-SAM: Self-assembled monolayers of 3-mercaptopropionic acid.