Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 30;39(3):371–387. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161369

Table 2.

Person factor constructs (scales) and operational definitions for the safety assessment measure

Proposed Construct Stakeholder / Expert Feedback and Research Team Decisions Field Testing Scale Name Operational Definition of Scale Construct
Cognitive Capacity
  • Agreement on core construct and that operational definition has unidimensionality

Cognitive Capacity
  • Cognitive impairments lead to a “lack of behavior” that creates specific safety risks

  • Forgetfulness, inattention, slowed processing speed, lack of initiation, and difficulty understanding information drives risk

  • Difficulty responding in an emergency situation

Physical Capacity
  • Determined that physical capacity related to upper and lower extremity functioning was not unidimensional

  • Agreed on visuomotor capacity as a unidimensional core construct

  • Agreed to measure presence of upper extremity impairments (e.g. spasticity, hemiparesis) in a physical and history questionnaire

Visuomotor Capacity
  • Visuomotor impairments lead to “unsuccessful behavior” that creates specific safety risks

  • Visuomotor safety risks are secondary to vision, strength, coordination, balance, and dexterity

  • Determined that a subset of persons with TBI used a wheelchair and that this posed risk

  • Agreed that a range of behavior related to wheelchair use would be a unidimensional core construct

Wheelchair Use
  • Impaired attention, processing speed, judgment, balance, and/or impulsivity lead to wheelchair use behaviors that place self and/or others at risk

  • Does not follow wheelchair safety precautions

Perceived Susceptibility to Harm
  • Agreed on core construct of perceiving risk; changed the construct name due to concerns that patients and families would not understand “perceived susceptibility”

  • Created separate construct, “Compliance Failures with Safety Recommendations” to capture not following medical recommendations or activity restrictions

Risk Perception
  • Impaired judgment of risk due to naiveté or limited awareness of impairments

  • Difficulty anticipating potentially harmful situations or consequences

  • Does not follow common safety precautions

Compliance Failures with Safety Recommendations
  • Does not seek medical treatment when needed

  • Does not comply with recommended treatments, activity restrictions, or situational supervision

  • Does not use needed assistive equipment

Self-Regulation
  • Agreement on core construct and that operational definition has unidimensionality

Self-Regulation
  • Impulsivity-acts directly on drives/emotions

  • Disinhibition-inability to control impulsive responses to situations

  • Aggression, sexual disinhibition, and wandering

Note. Following field testing, patients and families in focus groups to develop a translational report recommended renaming the scales; the final scale names reflect their feedback and research team decisions.