Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;44(11):1975–1984. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0392-x

Table 2.

c-Fos activation in various brain regions in HS rats from studies 3 and 4

(A) Study 3: c-Fos activation in various brain regions of HS rats after PPI
Number of c-Fos labeled neurons/mm2
No-Pulse (n=4) Pulse (n=4) Low-PPI (n=8) Medium-PPI (n=11) High-PPI (n=8)
Cg 53.2 ± 5.4 58.6 ± 18.2 66.9 ± 9.8 75.2 ± 14.3 84.8 ± 13.0
Dorsal CA1 4.4 ± 0.8 5.1 ± 2.7 4.9 ± 1.0 5.9 ± 1.5 2.3 ± 0.7
Dorsal DG 11.4 ± 2.3 10.0 ± 3.1 11.6 ± 2.6 10.2 ± 1.0 5.0 ± 0.7
Ventral CA1 11.2 ± 0.8 11.6 ± 2.1 12.2 ± 1.6 14.2 ± 1.3 12.6 ± 2.6
Ventral DG 7.9 ± 1.8 19.5 ± 7.8 12.8 ± 2.0 18.5 ± 3.7 17.2 ± 3.1
NAc core 5.8 ± 2.2 10.2 ± 2.8 10.9 ± 1.6 17.1 ± 3.4 9.7 ± 1.7
Striatum CP 9.5 ± 3.5 13.7 ± 4.5 13.7 ± 3.3 12.4 ± 2.4 15.6 ± 2.5
Striatum GP 5.1 ± 1.5 8.1 ± 3.7 8.0 ± 1.3 6.3 ± 1.5 6.3 ± 1.2
BLA 10.5 ± 4.1 8.4 ± 2.6 13.7 ± 2.3 19.7 ± 2.0 15.8 ± 3.0
CeA 7.9 ± 1.8 12.3 ± 4.3 15.4 ± 5.5 10.1 ± 1.4 8.0 ± 1.5
(B) Study 4: c-Fos activation in various brain regions of HS rats after second PPI
(n=4) (n=4) (n=7) (n=12) (n=9)
Cg 15.0 ± 6.9 12.9 ± 0.5 18.3 ± 2.1 23.1 ± 4.2 16.3 ± 2.2
Dorsal DG 25.1 ± 7.1 22.6 ± 2.8 25.4 ± 4.0 24.5 ± 3.0 24.8 ± 3.3
Ventral CA1 9.3 ± 1.1 13.0 ± 0.8 14.9 ± 1.3 13.8 ± 1.0 15.4 ± 2.6
Ventral DG 9.3 ± 1.0 8.6 ± 2.1 16.0 ± 1.7 16.4 ± 2.1 12.3 ± 1.6
NAc shell 13.5 ± 2.3 17.9 ± 9.7 21.3 ± 5.4 15.0 ± 3.0 20.8 ± 3.3
NAc core 9.8 ± 2.7 11.9 ± 4.2 11.2 ± 1.8 14.9 ± 1.6 12.6 ± 1.9
Striatum CP 3.9 ± 2.0 13.7 ± 4.5 11.8 ± 1.3 10.9 ± 1.5 12.3 ± 2.7
Striatum GP 6.3 ± 1.6 8.1 ± 1.7 11.6 ± 1.8 9.0 ± 1.6 10.9 ± 1.6
BLA 17.5 ± 7.2 26.8 ± 3.6 20.7 ± 3.4 20.1 ± 2.3 23.9 ± 3.1
CeA 8.4 ± 3.2* 26.8 ± 3.2 17.2 ± 2.2* 14.7 ± 1.6* 18.0 ± 3.4*#

(A) In study 3, HS rats were stratified by their PPI scores in rats with low-PPI scores (Low-PPI), medium-PPI scores (Medium-PPI) and high-PPI scores (High-PPI). Moreover, control groups for background noise (No-Pulse) and pulse-alone (Pulse) were used. (B) In study 4, one week after undergoing an MRI session, HS rats were submitted to another PPI session to obtain samples to conduct c-Fos analyses. See further procedural details in “Materials and Methods” and Fig. 1. Values are mean ± SEM. Abbreviations as in Table 1.

*p <  0.05 vs. Pulse group, #p < 0.05 vs. No-Pulse group in the CeA (Duncan’s multiple range test following significant ANOVA effect)