Skip to main content
letter
. 2019 Apr 2;37(4):358–367. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8

Table 2.

As of February 2019, the top ten data and metadata standards (all tagged ‘Ready’) ranked according to the number of implementations by databases and repositories

Rank Name Type Number of databases and repositories implementing it Number of journals’ and publishers’ policies recommending it Page views in 2018
1 FASTA Sequence Format 10.25504/FAIRsharing.rz4vfg Model/format 253 0 149
2 Gene Ontology (GO) 10.25504/FAIRsharing.6xq0ee Terminology artifact 159 0 149
3 Protein Data Bank (PDB) Format 10.25504/FAIRsharing.9y4cqw Model/format 59 0 10
4 Generic Feature Format Version 3 (GFF3) 10.25504/FAIRsharing.dnk0f6 Model/format 48 0 7
5 Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) 10.25504/FAIRsharing.62qk8w Terminology artifact 35 0 35
6 NCBI Taxonomy (NCBITAXON) 10.25504/FAIRsharing.fj07xj Terminology artifact 32 3 104
7 GenBank Sequence Format 10.25504/FAIRsharing.rg2vmt Model/format 29 0 39
8 Schema.org 10.25504/FAIRsharing.hzdzq8 Model/format 29 0 119
9 Sequence Ontology (SO) 10.25504/FAIRsharing.6bc7h9 Terminology artifact 28 0 15
10 Molecular Interaction Tabular (MITAB) 10.25504/FAIRsharing.ve0710 Model/format 18 0 13