Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep;9(9):1503–1515. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.09.07

Table S2. Performances of the signatures from different modalities.

Modality Training group Validation group
Accuracy AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity Specificity
T1-weighted imaging 65.46% 0.705 (0.636–0.768) 76.56% 60.00% 54.79% 0.647 (0.527–0.756) 76.92% 46.81%
T2-weighted imaging 56.70% 0.699 (0.629–0.763) 92.19% 39.23% 41.10% 0.635 (0.514–0.745) 80.77% 40.43%
DCE MRI 75.26% 0.784 (0.719–0.840) 65.65% 80.00% 75.34% 0.820 (0.713–0.900) 69.23% 80.85%
DWI 66.49% 0.732 (0.615–0.829) 73.08% 68.09% 69.86% 0.706 (0.636–0.769) 64.06% 67.69%
All modality 71.13% 0.778 (0.712–0.834) 76.56% 68.46% 71.23% 0.803 (0.693–0.887) 76.92% 74.74%

AUC, area under ROC curve; CI, confidence interval; DCE, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging. The AUC was reported in 95% confidence interval.