Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;26(5):461–473. doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09779-2

Table 2.

Intervention effects on changes in psychosocial distress, mindfulness, and eating behaviors

Scale range Control MMT Intervention effect1
Baseline (n = 104) Post-intervention (n = 89) Baseline (n = 106) Post-intervention (n = 82)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Change 95% CI P value
Psychological distress
 Perceived stress 0–40 18.4 (6.6) 17.0 (7.4) 19.1 (6.6) 15.6 (5.8)* − 2.09 − 4.04, − 0.14 0.04
 Depressive symptoms 0–27 6.8 (4.9) 6.1 (4.5) 7.6 (5.6) 4.5 (3.7)* − 1.95 −3.35, −0.55 0.007
 Pregnancy anxiety 1–4 2.1 (0.7) 2.0 (0.6) 2.1 (0.6) 2.0 (0.7) 0.01 − 0.17, 0.19 0.9
Acceptance
 Experiential avoidance 7–70 50.8 (10.8) 51.0 (10.7) 49.2 (10.7) 53.7 (8.8)* 3.96 1.18, 6.74 0.006
Eating behaviors
 Food addiction (YFAS) 0–7 2.0 (1.6) 1.7 (1.4)* 2.2 (1.6) 1.7 (1.1)* − 0.11 − 0.55, 0.32 0.61
 Emotional eating (DEBQ) 1–5 2.0 (0.9) 2.0 (0.8) 2.1 (0.8) 1.9 (0.7)* − 0.12 − 0.32, 0.09 0.26
 External eating (DEBQ) 1–5 2.8 (0.7) 2.8 (0.6) 2.84 (0.6) 2.77 (0.5)* − 0.13 − 0.29, 0.02 0.09

The sample size varies based on missing data, ranging from 167 to 170 for final sample with complete data for each measure

*p < 0.05

1The intervention effect tests the differential difference in the change scores, from pre to post, in the MMT vs. TAU groups