Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 22;26(5):499–511. doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09809-z

Table 4.

Results from the questionnaire on the value of specific BCTs and intention to recommend the program (n = 229)

BCT (component) na Median Q1–Q3
Supervised resistance trainingb
    Action planning (initial interview on exercise habits) 221 4 4–5
    Social support (coaches) 226 5 5–5
    Social support (peers) 222 4 3–5
    Structuring the physical environment (scheduled sessions) 225 5 4–5
    Feedback (strength tests) 222 5 4–5
    Self-monitoring (resistance training log) 220 5 4–5
    Problem solving (coping planning for exercise maintenance) 210 4 4–5
Home-based endurance trainingb
    Action planning (initial interview on exercise habits) 214 4 4–5
    Action planning (regular exercise planning) 208 4 3–5
    Social support (coaches) 215 5 4–5
    Social support (peers) 202 3 2–4
    Individual goal-setting 205 4 3–5
    Feedback (CPETs) 211 5 4–5
    Feedback (use of heart rate monitor) 219 5 4–5
    Feedback (reviews of heart rate monitor files) 203 4 4–5
    Self-monitoring (endurance training log) 214 4 3–5
    Problem solving (reviews to explore motivational issues) 208 4 4–5
    Problem solving (coping planning for exercise maintenance) 198 4 4–5
Intention to recommend the program to others with a similar conditionc 223 5 5–5

aNumbers vary due to internal attrition

bResponse to the 1–5 rating scale: 1 = Not at all valuable and 5 = Very valuable

cResponse to the 1–5 rating scale: 1 = No, definitely not and 5 = Yes, definitely

BCTs behaviour change techniques, CPETs cardiopulmonary exercise tests