Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 1;17:70. doi: 10.18332/tid/110677

Table 4.

Percentage difference between the choice of tobacco pack category (Telangana, n=1001)

Between pack C and B
Between pack D and B
Between pack D and C
Unadjusted % difference ( 95% CI) Adjusted % difference ( 95% CI)* Unadjusted % difference ( 95% CI) Adjusted % difference ( 95% CI)* Unadjusted % difference ( 95% CI) Adjusted % difference ( 95% CI)*
1. Most effective in motivating tobacco users to quit 62.20 (59.01 – 65.38) 62.34 (59.21 – 65.47) 33.30 (30.19 – 36.40) 33.45 (30.39 – 36.52) -28.90 (-34.79 – -23.01) -28.88 (-34.70 – -23.07)
2. Most effective in preventing initiation of tobacco use 41.14 (37.94 – 44.34) 41.35 (38.18 – 44.51) 54.65 (51.41 – 57.89) 54.73 (51.52 – 57.93) 13.51 (7.41 – 19.61) 13.38 (7.33 – 19.43)
3. Most likely to make you think that health risks of tobacco are extremely serious 50.50 (47.27 – 53.73) 50.61 (47.40 – 53.81) 45.99 (42.77 – 49.21) 45.88 (42.66 – 49.10) -4.51 (-10.67 – 16.52) -4.72 (-10.87 – 1.42)
4. GHWs are most noticeable 54.15 (50.97 – 57.33) 54.15 (50.97 – 57.33) 43.54 (40.38 – 46.71) 43.54 (40.38 – 46.71) -10.61 (-16.76 – -4.46) -10.61 (-16.75 – -4.46)
5. Message conveyed by the GHW is easiest to understand 58.50 (55.34 – 61.66) 58.51 (55.35 – 61.66) 39.00 (35.87 – 42.13) 38.99 (35.87 – 42.11) -19.50 (-25.56 – -13.44) -19.51 (-25.56 – -13.47)
6. Most likely to lure adults into using tobacco products -2.10 (-4.18 – -0.02) -2.09 (-4.15 – -0.03) -5.00 (-6.77 – -3.23) -4.99 (-6.75 – -3.24) -2.90 (-4.45 – -1.35) -2.91 (-4.45 – -1.37)
7. Most likely to lure children and adolescents into using tobacco products -0.2 (-2.68 – 2.28) -0.19 (-2.66 – 2.28) -5.4 (-7.41 – -3.39) -5.40 (-7.40 – -3.39) -5.2 (-7.19 – -3.20) -5.21 (-7.20 – -3.22)
8. Support for pack category 74.37 (71.65 – 77.10) 74.35 (71.66 – 77.04) 25.32 (22.61 – 28.04) 25.34 (22.66 – 28.03) -49.05 (-54.46 – -43.64) -49.01 (-54.35 – -43.67)
*

Linear regression model adjusted for covariates that were significantly associated with the outcome. The covariates were gender (female/male), area (rural/urban), socioeconomic status (low/middle/high), age groups (13–17 /18–24 /25–44 /≥45 years) and tobacco use (never user/user). Q1–SES excluded; Q2–age group excluded; Q3–gender/SES excluded; Q4–gender/SES/tobacco use excluded; Q5–SES/tobacco use/age group excluded; Q6, 7, 8–age group and tobacco use excluded. Bold numbers indicate significance (p<0.05).