Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct;67(10):1593–1598. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1821_18

Table 2.

Management at our centre of patients who underwent TPK

Parameters n=227 Percentage
Distance travelled (km)
 ≤100 84 37
 101-300 88 38.7
 301-500 11 4.8
 >500 44 19.3
Reasons for coming to AEH
 Advised by friend 76 33.4
 Referred by previous doctor 73 32.1
 No improvement with prior treatment 31 13.6
 Cultural belief 4 1.7
 Easy access 9 3.9
 No particular reason 34 14.9
Stream of admission
 Paying 126 55.5
 Non-paying 101 44.4
Accompanying person
 0 9 3.9
 1 193 88.5
 2 24 11
 3 1 0.4
Medical treatment before surgery
 Yes 156 68.7
 No 71 31.2
Number of medical treatment visits before surgery
 1 34 21.79
 2 30 19.23
 3 50 32.05
 4 29 18.59
 >4 13 8.33
Indications for TPKa
 Perforation 119 52.42
 Impending perforation 18 7.93
 Threatening limbal involvement 41 18.06
 Progression with maximum medical therapy 105 46.26

aMany patients had more than one indication for TPK