Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;5:76. doi: 10.1038/s41394-019-0219-3

Table 1.

Number (%) of lay participants with certain demographic characteristics who created satisfactory and unsatisfactory FPs

Demographic category N (%) Satisf. FP Un-satisf. FP χ²
Age (years) 18–25 4 (11%) 3 1

Number of Satisf. FP from participants ≤ 45 vs. > 45 years

χ2(1) = 6.47, P = 0.01*

26–35 10 (26%) 8 2
36–45 1 (3%) 1 0
Subtotal of ≤45 15 12 3
(Five missing participant questionnaires, one prefer not to mention) 46–55 9 (24%) 2 6
56–65 6 (16%) 1 4
66–75 6 (16%) 3 1
Over 75 1 (3%) 0 0
Subtotal of >45 22 6 11
Educational level Vocational 1 (3%) 1 0

Number of Satif. FP from high participants with education degrees vs. other degrees

χ2(1) = 0.02, P = 0.88

Associate’s degree 6 (16%) 2 3
High school diploma or GED 12 (32%) 6 4
Subtotal 19 9 7
(Five missing participant questionnaires) Bachelor’s degree 10 (26%) 6 4
Master’s degree 8 (21%) 3 3
Doctorate degree 1 (3%) 1 0
Subtotal 19 10 7

FP floor plan, vs. versus, GED general educational degree, Satisf satisfactory

*P < 0.05