Table 2. Testing data fit statistics for the dichotomized base and ensemble models.
Model (citation) | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ae. aegypti | |||||
Monaghan [28] | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.85 |
Ensemble [n/a] | 0.57 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
Johnson [30] | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.64 | 0.91 | 0.81 |
Christophers [54] | 0.34 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.80 |
Kraemer [25] | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.89 | 0.77 |
Capinha [20] | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 0.91 | 0.75 |
Campbell [24] | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 0.83 | 0.71 |
Ae. albopictus | |||||
Johnson [30] | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.97 |
Ensemble [n/a] | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
Mogi [18] | 0.98 | 0.51 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.93 |
Kraemer [25] | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.58 | 0.92 |
Kobayashi [11] | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.96 | 0.53 | 0.90 |
Campbell [24] | 0.84 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.86 |
Proestos [26] | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.36 | 0.82 |
ECDC [55] | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.97 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
Medlock [12] | 0.78 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.35 | 0.80 |