TABLE 2.
Microbiome species effect
on host life history |
Possible signal |
||
---|---|---|---|
Presence | Abundance | Functions in specific contexts | |
Affects only MiDOT | Vertical transmission: no useful information (always present) |
Vertical transmission: contains information if population growth is predictable; could then trigger or increase the rate of transition. |
Vertical transmission: contains information if changes in microbial function are correlated with changes in host size; could then trigger, increase (or decrease for functions largest at small sizes) the rate of transition. |
Horizontal transmission: if no external drivers to acquisition (Fig. 2A), then high variance in timing at low transmission could potentially be leveraged for bet-hedging. If acquisition is context/timing specific (Fig. 2B and C), acquisition potentially selected as a trigger or as an increase in the rate of a transition. |
Horizontal transmission contains information only if at high rates (low rates result in high variance [Fig. 2A, light green], where high rates have low variance, resembling vertical transmission in pattern over age/time); then selected to trigger or increase the rate of transition. |
Horizontal transmission: contains information if functional succession is reliable (trigger or increase or decrease the rate of transition as discussed above) |
|
Affects MiDOT and
alters other fitness components (growth, survival); is thus guaranteed to contain a signal, since presence encodes information relevant to the optimal. |
Vertical transmission: no useful information (always present) |
Vertical or horizontal transmission: modulation possible (increases or decreases), see the cell above; bet-hedging unlikely; see the cell on the left |
Assuming that functional composition is more important than taxonomic composition (i.e., different microbes can have the same effect on fitness components like growth and survival) then selection for increases or decreases based around functional composition expected (as discussed above). |
Horizontal transmission: effect on other fitness components might increase correlations within a cohort of hosts, thus reducing utility for bet-hedging. | |||
Increases or decreases
in the rate of a transition could both occur (depending on the direction of the effect on other fitness components); triggering unlikely. | |||
As above but in an environment-specific fashion. |
As in the cell above, with the potential addition of cue indicative of specific environment. |
As in the cell above, with the potential addition of cue indicative of specific environment. |
As in the cell above, with the potential addition of cue indicative of environment. |
Potentially makes the signal misleading if microbiome cues do not contain environmental information. |
If the cue is misleading, the by-product leads to mismatch between timing and environment |
Categorizing MiDOT via its effects across the life history (leftmost column), and the information encoded by presence/abundance/functions and by-products (Possible signal columns), for vertical or horizontal transmission. We focus on the example of a monocarpic species and evaluate potential contributions to optimizing timing (either as a trigger or as increase/decrease in the rate of a transition [Fig. 1]) or bet-hedging (see the text).