Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD003875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003875.pub3

3. Control versus Emdogain: PPD at 1 year.

Study Parallel group/Split mouth EMD
n mean (SD)
Control
n  mean (SD)
Difference
n mean (SE)
Silvestri 2000 P 10  4.9 (1.79) 10  1.40 (1.26) 20  3.5 (0.69)
Tonetti 2002 P 83  3.9 (1.7) 83  3.3 (1.7) 166 0.60 (0.26)
Zucchelli 2002 P 30  5.1 (0.7) 30  4.5 (1.0) 60  0.60 (0.22)
Francetti 2004 P 12  4.71 (1.60) 12  2.57 (1.27) 24  2.14 (0.59)
Grusovin 2009 P 15  3.9 (1.0) 15  4.2 (1.6) 30  0.3 (0.49)
Heijl 1997 S 31  3.3 (1.4) 31  2.6 (1.2) 31  0.70 (0.25)
Pontoriero 1999 S 10  4.4 10  3.5  10  0.7 (0.47)
Okuda 2000 S 16  3.0 (0.97) 16  2.22 (0.81) 16  0.78 (0.32)
Rosing 2005 S 14  4.17 (1.80) 14  4.39 (1.14) 14  ‐0.22 (0.57) (0.64)*

*authors' value from e‐mail
 PPD = probing pocket depth
 SD = standard deviation
 SE = standard error