Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Matern Child Health J. 2019 Nov;23(11):1564–1572. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02804-6

Table 4.

Adjusted estimates of the relationship between the fee bump and the number of prenatal care visits among Medicaid-insured women in 37 states (n=6,214,618)

By Race and Ethnicity
All White, Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Other, Non-Hispanic Hispanic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Panel A. All States in Analytical Sample
Large fee bump
states × Post
 Coefficient 0.13 0.17* 0.24** 0.05 −0.06
95% CI (−0.02, 0.29) (0.00, 0.33) (0.10, 0.39) (−0.14, 0.23) (−0.23, 0.10)
Mean of
Dependent Var 10.78 11.08 10.17 10.56 10.83
N 6,214,618 2,383,501 1,267,105 367,107 2,196,905
Panel B. States vithout Medicaid Expansion by 2014
Large fee bump
states × Post
Coefficient 0.20* 0.18* 0.33* 0.02 0.01
95% CI (0.03, 0.37) (0.02, 0.34) (0.07, 0.59) (−0.26, 0.29) (−0.22, 0.24)
Mean of
Dependent Var 10.45 10.88 10.18 9.93 10.16
N 2,783,603 1,142,940 697,871 115,837 826,955

Notes: Unit of observation is individual birth. Cluster-robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered by state in Panel A and by county in Panel B. All regressions control for mother, county and state characteristics in Table 1, as well as year-month and state fixed effects.

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01.