. 2019 Oct 10;9:14662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49651-7

Table 1.

Results from the generalized linear regression models with negative binominal distribution testing the effect of the distance from coastline on the densities of CAMAs.

		Estimate	SE	Wald chi-square (z-value)	p-value (z)	AIC	LR (X²)	p-value (LR)
Basophilic CAMAs	Intercept	3.53176	0.399923	8.846	<2e-16***	187.52	67.427	2.2e-16***
Basophilic CAMAs	Distance^†	−0.17477	0.02769	−6.312	2.76e-10***
Eosinophilic CAMAs	Intercept	−3.508	1.3253	−2.647	0.00812**	46.991
Eosinophilic CAMAs	Distance^†	0.077	0.0459	1.678	0.09643
CAMAs detected by FISH	Intercept	3.19428	0.35556	8.984	<2e-16***	212.09	51.662	6.594e-13***
CAMAs detected by FISH	Distance^†	−0.12714	0.02092	−6.077	1.22e-09***

^†The distance indicates distance to closest coastline.

p-values are **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.

AIC and LR indicates Akaike’s Information Criterion and likelihood-ratio.