Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;5(3):84. doi: 10.3390/jof5030084

Table 1.

Number of respondents of a given submitted identification employing a given identification method.

C. auris
(n = 82)
C. haemulonii
(n = 27)
No Species Identification
(n = 29)
Other Species Identification
(n = 4)
Bruker MALDI Biotyper 1 71 (86.6%) - 1 (3.4%) -
bioMérieux Vitek YST ID 2 9 (11.0%) 23 (85.2%) 4 (13.8%) -
bioMérieux Vitek MS 3 - 4 (14.8%) 9 (31.0%) 1 (25.0%)
Traditional biochemical methods - - 15 (51.7%) 3 (75.0%)
Other 2 (2.4%) - - -

1 Employing a research-use only (RUO) or an in vitro diagnostics CE-approved library (CE-IVD). 2 Using Vitek YST ID library version V. 7.01 or V. 8.01. 3 Using a CE-IVD-approved library. Hyphen (-) indicates that no respondents used the method concerned for a given identification.