Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 10;9(3):71. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9030071

Table 3.

Comparisons between the hybrid device and universal goniometer for measurement of craniocervical ranges.

First Rater First Evaluation in Degrees by the Hybrid Device (95% CI) First Rater First Evaluation in Degrees by the Universal Goniometer (95% CI) Between-Device Mean Difference in Degrees (95% CI) p Value Correlation Coefficient r Value (95% CI) p Value Coefficient of Repeatability (Degrees)
Flexion 41.80
(37.70 to 45.90)
41.58
(37.47 to 45.88)
0.12
(−0.92 to 1.16)
0.815 0.968
(0.941 to 0.983)
<0.001 * 6.428
Extension 51.48
(47.56 to 55.40)
51.58
(47.67 to 55.49)
−0.09
(−1.05 to 0.86)
0.838 0.969
(0.944 to 0.984)
<0.001 * 5.888
Side-bending to Right 34.51
(32.78 to 36.23)
34.53
(32.51 to 32.56)
−0.02
(−0.73 to 0.68)
0.944 0.941
(0.892 to 0.968)
<0.001 * 4.399
Side-bending to Left 31.34
(29.48 to 33.19)
30.58
(28.73 to 32.43)
0.75
(0.00 to 1.50)
0.047 * 0.918
(0.852 to 0.956)
<0.001 * 4.810
Rotating to Right 50.80
(48.16 to 53.44)
52.17
(49.52 to 54.81)
−1.36
(−2.37 to −0.36)
0.009 * 0.927
(0.867 to 0.961)
<0.001 * 6.720
Rotating to Left 47.82
(45.51 to 50.14)
49.51
(47.32 to 51.70)
−1.68
(−2.58 to −0.78)
0.000 * 0.921
(0.857 to 0.957)
<0.001 * 6.428

Note: * indicates p < 0.05.