Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 26;4(15):16257–16269. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00491

Table 6. SAXS Rg Values of CJ2.9.A-3, CJ2.9.A-7, CJ2.9.A-15, and CJ2.9.A-30 To Accompany Figure 3 and CJ2.3.E-61, CJ2.7.B-15, CJ2.9.B-30, CJ3.3.B-15, CJ3.7.A-17, CJ3.9.A-15, ISG.3.B-15, ISG.7.A-60, and ISG.9.B-45 To Accompany Figure 4a.

figure sample Rg1 (Å) Rg2 (Å) Rg3 (Å)
3 CJ2.9.A-3 18.9 ± 0.9    
  CJ2.9.A-7 18 ± 4    
  CJ2.9.A-15b 33.2 ± 0.1    
  CJ2.9.A-30b 29.68 ± 0.06    
         
4 CJ2.3.E-61b 19.05 ± 0.07 117.9 ± 0.2 987 ± 2
  CJ2.7.B-15b 6.200 ± 0.001 149.6 ± 0.1  
  CJ2.9.B-30 25.4 ± 0.2 5000 ± 3000  
  CJ3.3.B-15 29 ± 3    
  CJ3.7.A-17 16 ± 2 260 ± 50  
  CJ3.9.A-15b 28.0 ± 0.8 1943 ± 8  
  ISG.3.B-15 8 ± 1 74 ± 2  
  ISG.7.A-60 16 ± 2    
  ISG.9.B-45 15 ± 4 430 ± 40  
a

Errors for Rg values are reported as two standard derivations of fits of multiple replicates of the each sample, unless otherwise indicated.

b

Error is due to fitting uncertainties because of lack of duplicates.