Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 12;10(10):5042–5058. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.005042

Table 2. Mean absolute distance (MAD) and rooted mean square error (RMSE) evaluated on 20 manually delineated scans for four of the tested methods. Smaller values are better and the best value for both MAD and RMSE are shown in bold font.

MAD (μm)
RMSE (μm)
Boundary AURA SR-Net-T ReLayNet SR-Net AURA SR-Net-T ReLayNet SR-Net
ILM 2.37 (0.36) 2.96 (0.78) 3.17 (0.61) 2.38 (0.36) 3.08 (0.51) 4.22 (2.50) 4.11 (1.06) 3.20 (0.99)
RNFL-GCL 3.09 (0.64) 3.55 (0.55) 3.75 (0.84) 3.10 (0.55) 4.58 (1.03) 5.52 (2.07) 5.65 (1.57) 4.64 (1.19)
IPL-INL 3.43 (0.53) 3.71 (0.82) 3.42 (0.45) 2.89 (0.42) 4.57 (0.79) 5.08 (1.47) 4.59 (0.75) 3.91 (0.57)
INL-OPL 3.25 (0.48) 3.80 (0.69) 3.65 (0.34) 3.15 (0.56) 4.29 (0.58) 4.94 (0.96) 4.75 (0.56) 4.10 (0.71)
OPL-ONL 2.96 (0.55) 3.87 (0.78) 3.28 (0.63) 2.76 (0.59) 4.36 (1.05) 5.11 (1.06) 4.57 (1.24) 3.99 (1.12)
ELM 2.69 (0.44) 3.72 (1.26) 3.04 (0.43) 2.65 (0.66) 3.38 (0.54) 4.52 (1.34) 3.78 (0.52) 3.38 (0.81)
IS-OS 2.07 (0.81) 3.57 (1.28) 2.73 (0.45) 2.10 (0.75) 2.62 (0.91) 4.23 (1.27) 3.31 (0.46) 2.73 (0.89)
OS-RPE 3.77 (0.94) 4.72 (1.12) 4.22 (1.48) 3.81 (1.17) 4.94 (1.14) 5.80 (1.25) 5.31 (1.66) 4.89 (1.42)
BM 2.89 (2.18) 5.44 (2.98) 3.09 (1.35) 3.71 (2.27) 3.61 (2.26) 6.21 (2.96) 3.87 (1.47) 4.41 (2.34)

Overall 2.95 (1.04) 3.93 (1.47) 3.37 (0.92) 2.95 (1.10) 3.94 (1.31) 5.07 (1.86) 4.44 (1.31) 3.92 (1.37)