Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223621

Table 5. PSP-tailored SAND in PSP according to cognitive status.

Continuous scores Impaired scores (%)
SAND task PSP-D
(12)
PSP-MCImd (24) PSP-MCI sd
(9)
PSP-NC
(4)
p PSP-D
(12)
PSP-MCImd
(24)
PSP-MCIsd
(9)
PSP-NC
(4)
p
Naming
Total 10 (5) 10 (5) 11.5 (5.25) 14 (0) 0.094 58.3% 45.8% 22.2% 0% 0.209
Living 5 (2.75) 5 (4) 5 (3.25) 7 (0) 0.303 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0% 0.693
Non-living 5 (3) 5 (1.5) 6.5 (3) 7 (0) 0.065 75% 58.3% 44.4% 0% 0.118
Sentence comprehension 5 (3.5) 7 (3) 7.5 (1.25) 10 (4) 0.019a,c,e,f 66.7% 50% 25% 0% 0.055
Single word comprehension
Total 10 (4) 10 (4) 11.5 (1) 12 (1) 0.016a,c,e,f 66.7% 45.8% 22.2% 0% 0.042a,c
Living 4 (3) 5 (3) 6 (1) 6 (1) 0.056 66.7% 41.7% 44.4% 0% 0.093
Non-living 5 (2) 5 (2) 6 (0.25) 6 (1) 0.175 41.7% 25% 11.1% 0% 0.327
Repetition
Total 7 (3.5) 7 (3) 7.5 (2.75) 7.5 (2) 0.316 50% 50% 22.2% 66.7% 0.590
Words 6 (2) 5 (2) 6 (1) 6 (2) 0.021d,f 33.3% 37.5% 0% 0% 0.119
Non words 1 (2.5) 2 (2) 2 (2.5) 1 (2.5) 0.846 41.7% 41.7% 22.2% 50% 0.621
Sentence repetion
Total 3 (3) 3 (2) 2 (2) 6 (0) 0.197 58.3% 50% 55.6% 0% 0.351
Predictable 1 (1) 1 (2) 1 (0.5) 3 (0) 0.233 66.7% 62.5% 55.6% 0% 0.192
Unpredictable 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1.5) 3 (0) 0.102 41.7% 16.7% 22.2% 0% 0.304
Reading
Total 11 (8) 14 (4) 16 (3.25) 15 (0) 0.039a 66.7% 50% 11.1% 25% 0.047a,d
Words 9 (6.5) 11 (4) 12 (2.25) 11 (0) 0.140 66.7% 50% 33.3% 25% 0.256
Non words 2 (2.5) 4 (2) 4 (1) 4 (0) 0.029a,c 58.3% 29.2% 11.1% 0% 0.021a,c
Semantic associations 2 (1.5) 2 (1) 2.5 (1.5) 3 (0) 0.355 25% 16.7% 11.1% 0% 0.724
Writing
Information Units 1 (3) 3 (3) 4 (1.5) 4 (0) 0.009 a,b,c 66.7% 19% 0% 25% 0.012a,b
Picture description
Information Units 3 (3.5) 4 (3) 4 (4) 3 (0) 0.475 63.6% 33.3% 28.6% 50% 0.488
PSP-tailored SAND Global Score 9 (10) 8 (9) 5 (6.5) 3 (0) 0.024a,c 83.3% 75% 66.7% 50% 0.603

No significant differences were detected according with the significance threshold corrected for multiple comparisons (< 0.001). However, in Italics are highlighted significant differences detected with the significance threshold set at p < 0.05

a = Dementia vs MCI-sd

b = Dementia vs MCI-md

c = Dementia vs NC

d = MCI-sd vs MCI-md

e = MCI- sd vs NC

f = MCI-md vs NC.