Table 1.

Summary of statistical analyses for Figures 7E,F and 8A,B

	Summary	p
Tukey's multiple-comparisons test
Fig. 7E
WT vs NgR+/−	ns	0.360
WT vs PlexA2+/−	ns	0.395
WT vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	*	0.019
NgR+/− vs PlexA2+/−	ns	>0.999
NgR+/− vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	ns	0.442
PlexA2+/− vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	ns	0.466
Fig. 7F
WT vs NgR+/−	ns	0.100
WT vs PlexA2+/−	ns	0.441
WT vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	*	0.023
NgR+/− vs PlexA2+/−	ns	0.864
NgR+/− vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	ns	0.880
PlexA2+/− vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	ns	0.468
Fig. 8A, Day28
WT vs NgR+/−	ns	0.272
WT vs PlexA2+/−	ns	0.256
WT vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	**	0.003
NgR+/− vs PlexA2+/−	ns	1.000
NgR+/− vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	ns	0.174
PlexA2+/− vs NgR+/−Plex+/−	ns	0.232
Parametric paired t test
Fig. 8B
WT, Day 2 vs Day 28	ns	0.1844
NgR+/−, Day 2 vs Day 28	*	0.0165
PlexA2+/−, Day 2 vs Day 28	*	0.0477
NgR+/−Plex+/−, Day 2 vs Day 28	***	0.0004
Bonferroni correction
Fig. 8B
WT, Day 2 vs Day 28	ns	0.7376
NgR+/−, Day 2 vs Day 28	ns	0.066
PlexA2+/−, Day 2 vs Day 28	ns	0.1908
NgR+/−Plex+/−, Day 2 vs Day 28	**	0.0016

*p < 0.05,

**p < 0.005,

***p < 0.0005.