Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 21;78(9):1242–1248. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215145

Table 1.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of the 706 patients from the EUSTAR database included in the analysis

Characteristics Patients (n=706) Available data (% patients)
Demographic
Male sex 172 (24.4) 100
Age, mean±SD 52.9±12.9 100
Disease duration, months (mean±SD) 101.1±94.0 94.1
Body weight, kg (mean±SD) 64.6±13.4 97.2
Laboratory parameters
ANA positive 657 (94.4) 98.6
ACA positive 48 (7.1) 96.3
Anti-Scl70 positive 414 (60.2) 97.5
Anti-U1RNP positive 27 (4.7) 81.3
Creatine kinase elevation 64 (9.5) 95.2
Proteinuria 57 (8.4) 95.6
Hypocomplementaemia 39 (6.3) 88.1
ESR>20 mm/1 hour, mean±SD 25.3±20.6 94.5
CRP elevation 190 (27.7) 97.0
Vascular
Raynaud’s present 683 (96.7) 100
DU ever 266 (38.1) 98.9
Active DU* 126 (18.1) 98.7
Scleroderma (puffy fingers) 303 (44.2) 97.2
Worsening of finger vascularisation within the last month 162 (23.3) 98.3
Musculoskeletal
Tendon friction rubs 89 (12.8) 98.3
Joint synovitis 108 (15.4) 99.3
Joint contractures 310 (44.4) 98.9
Muscle weakness 164 (23.4) 99.3
Skin
mRSS, mean±SD 14.2±9.1 93.2
Worsening of skin changes within the last month 141 (20.3) 98.3
Skin progression rate, mean±SD 0.6±1.7 88.2
Cardiopulmonary
Arterial hypertension 154 (21.9) 99.6
Pericardial effusion 58 (8.9) 92.5
Echocardiography-suspected PH 113 (16.3) 98.0
Conduction blocks 104 (15.6) 94.2
Abnormal diastolic function 170 (25.0) 96.2
Lung fibrosis† 131 (19.7) 94.3
Significant dyspnoea 91 (13.2) 97.7
DLCO, %predicted (mean±SD) 64.1±20.2 94.1
FVC, %predicted (mean±SD) 86.4±21.3 96.5
FEV1, %predicted (mean±SD) 85.0±18.7 78.3
TLC, %predicted (mean±SD) 84.2±19.9 66.1
LVEF, %predicted (mean±SD) 61.7±7.0 96.5
Gastrointestinal
Oesophageal symptoms 455 (64.5) 99.9
Stomach symptoms 192 (27.4) 99.3
Intestinal symptoms 177 (25.2) 99.3
Kidney
Renal crisis 34 (4.8) 99.4
Disease activity
Active disease‡ 191 (30.7) 88.1

Data are n (%) unless otherwise stated. (Percentages with characteristics were calculated from numbers of patients with data available).

Clinical manifestations were defined according to the EUSTAR definitions.15

Presence of significant dyspnoea was based on the judgement of the treating physician.

*Active DUs was a composite endpoint that was considered positive if either DU (from the minimal essential dataset) or digital gangrene was present.

†Lung fibrosis was defined as FVC<60% or FVC<70% and presence of lung fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography.

‡Active disease was defined as score >3 calculated according to the EScSG disease activity indices for SSc.38

ACA, anti-centromere antibody; ANA, anti-nuclear antibody; CRP, C-reactive protein; DLCO, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; DU, digital ulcer; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate;EScSG, European Scleroderma Study Group; EUSTAR, European Scleroderma Trials and Research; FEV1, forced expiratory volume after 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction;mRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; PH, pulmonary hypertension; TLC, total lung capacity.