Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 11;10:4660. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12493-y

Table 2.

Comparison of PacBio and Illumina SNV calls for NA12878

Genome Inside GIAB Outside GIAB Segmental Dup. Segmental Dup.
(1–22) Confident Confident (≥95% similar) (≥99% similar)
Region size 2.8 Gb 2.4 Gb 330.7 Mb 102.8 Mb 47.5 Mb
# SNVs 3,518,530 3,002,660 515,870 180,889 78,851
PacBio Ts/Tv 2.08 2.14 1.75 1.95 1.99
# SNVs 3,563,787 3,065,573 498,214 116,649 18,684
Illumina Ts/Tv 2.03 2.1 1.66 1.84 1.79
# SNVs 254,428 63,848 190,580 103,621 69,705
Unique to PacBio Ts/Tv 1.63 1.83 1.57 1.9 1.99
# SNVs 299,733 126,763 172,970 39,409 9538
Unique to Illumina Ts/Tv 1.3 1.26 1.33 1.53 1.55
Shared # SNVs 3,264,078 2,938,812 325,266 77,241 9146
Illumina & PacBio Ts/Tv 2.12 2.15 1.85 2.01 2.04

Variants were called using short reads (33× coverage) with FreeBayes and using SMS long reads (30× coverage) with Longshot. The number of variants called by each technology, the number of variants shared between the two technologies, and the corresponding transition/transversion (Ts/Tv) ratios are shown for the whole genome and various subsets of the genome including GIAB high-confidence regions and segmental duplications with high sequence identity