Table 3.
Advantages and disadvantages of different strategies for functional cell induction
Strategy | Induction efficiency | Reproducibi-lity/stability | Target specificity | Cellular function | In vivo engraftment | Safety | Scaling up | Cost | Ref. |
TF-mediated pluripotent reprogramming followed by differentia-tion | Moderate | Highly reproducible/ stable | High | Immature | Low | Genomic integration; tumorigenesis risk | Expandable before differentia-tion | Very high | [11,97-99] |
TF-mediated direct lineage conversion | Fast and efficient | Reproducible/stable | High | Deficient | Low | Genomic integration | Expandable in progenitors | High | [100-103] |
Chemical-mediated pluripotent reprogramming followed by differentia-tion | Controversial | Poorly reproducible/ unstable | Low | Not clear | Not clear | Integration-free | Not clear | Low | [24,25,29,31] |
Chemical-mediated direct lineage conversion | Low | Reproducible/ unstable | Low | Deficient | Low | Integration-free | Expandable in progenitors | Very low | [18,77,104,105] |
Chemical-mediated direct lineage expansion | Fast and efficient | Reproducible/ unstable | Low | Close to primary | High | Integration free | Expandable in rodents/ Limited in humans | Very low | [62,64,67,68] |
TF: Transcriptional factor; XENs: Extraembryonic endoderm-like cells.