Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 11;2(3):59. doi: 10.3390/mps2030059

Table 3.

Mean correction results for different emission intensities.

AOs on
7% 1 8% 9% 10%
FWHMX (µm) 2.672 ± 0.019 2.695 ± 0.016 2.686 ± 0.018 2.682 ± 0.018
FWHMY (µm) 2.343 ± 0.030 2.230 ± 0.045 2.277 ± 0.030 2.281 ± 0.025
FWHMZ (µm) 3.491 ± 0.073 3.483 ± 0.065 3.495 ± 0.070 3.540 ± 0.063
RMS (µm) 0.025 ± 0.002 0.016 ± 0.001 0.014 ± 0.001 0.013 ± 0.001
SR 0.909 ± 0.011 0.961 ± 0.003 0.969 ± 0.003 0.973 ± 0.002

1 Intensity was measured as a fraction of the saturation intensity of the sensor. Wavefront information was acquired at 100 ms exposure time and EM gain of 300. Fifteen iterations were used to perform the corrections. Illumination intensity was adjusted on a case-by-case basis to achieve the desired emission intensity.