Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 24;8(3):131. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8030131

Table 1.

Comparison of recovery ratio between developed method (HA vortex) and liquid collector.

Trial Method Concentration of Viruses in the Bubbled Water Sample (Copies/mL Water) Dissipated Water Volume (mL) Air Volume (m3) Captured Viruses per Air (Copies/m3 Air)
PV MNV PV MNV
Before After Before After Before After
1 HA vortex 2.9 × 108 2.7 × 108 2.5 × 106 1.6 × 106 7.7 × 105 1.5 × 106 2.06 121 1.3 × 102 2.5 × 100 1.9 × 103
Liquid Collector 4.33 375 6.7 × 101 2.1 × 101 3.2 × 102
2 HA vortex 3.1 × 108 3.3 × 108 2.4 × 106 1.6 × 106 1.4 × 106 7.2 × 105 2.01 121 5.4 × 101 9.5 × 100 3.9 × 102
Liquid Collector 3.52 375 4.9 × 101 2.3 × 101 1.6 × 102
3 HA vortex 3.3 × 108 2.9 × 108 2.4 × 106 2.1 × 106 1.4 × 106 7.2 × 105 2.02 121 3.5 × 101 1.2 × 101 3.5 × 102
Liquid Collector 4.37 375 5.5 × 101 2.1 × 101 2.8 × 102

Note: Qβ; Bacteriophage, PV; Poliovirus, MNV; Murine norovirus, Before/After; Virus concentration of the virus-inoculated water sample before/after bubbling (virus generation) manipulation.