Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 9;14:8073–8094. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S220740

Table 1.

Composition of various experimental nanoparticle formulations with their physicochemical characteristics

Formulation PLGA:Drug: DCM (Ratio by weight) Sabilizer used Average particle diameter (Z-average) (nm) Polydispersity indexa Zeta potential (mV) %Drug loadinga %Entrapment efficiencya
PVA 40:4:1 PVA (2.5% w/v) 357 0.398±0.03 −7.39±0.008 5±0.02 55%±0.3
PVA+TWEEN 40:4:1 PVA (2.5% w/v) &Tween 80 (14% v/v) (F2) 220 0.234±0.01 −14.7±0.009 8.5±0.015 93.5%±0.21
PVA+PLU-68 40:4:1 PVA (2.5% w/v) & Pluronic-68 (0.5% w/v) 449 0.041±0.018 −12.2±0.01 7±0.12 77%±0.5
PVA+PLU-127 40:4:1 PVA (2.5% w/v) & Pluronic- 127 (0.5% w/v) 466 0.419±0.022 −13.7±0.011 6.9±0.03 75%±0.33
PVA+TPGS 40:4:1 PVA (2.5% w/v) & TPGS (0.03%w/v) 640 0.925±0.011 −9.98±0.008 6.03±0.15 66%±0.83
Antibody- conjugated formulation 40:4:1 PVA (2.5% w/v) &Tween 80 (14% v/v) 241 0.230±0.009 −2.93±0.013 8±0.01 88%±0.17

Note: aEach value represents mean ± SD (n=3).

Abbreviations: PLGA, poly (lactide-co-glycolide); DCM, dichloromethane; PVA, poly(vinyl alcohol); TWEEN, tween 80; PLU-68, pluronic F68; PLU-127, pluronic F127; TPGS, D -α-tocopherol polyethylene glycol succinate.