Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S442–S447. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.23

Table 1. Patient demographics of the included studies.

Author Journal Year Country Number of cases Mean age (range) Male:female Stone free rate (%) Stone size, mm (range)
Suliman et al. (15) Urolithiasis 2018 England 36 10.6 (1.4–15.7) NR 89.0 8 [3–23]
Freton et al. (16) J Endourol 2017 France 46 9.1 (±0.9 SD) NR 76.1 21.6 (±2.0 SD)
Corcoran et al. (17) J Urol 2008 USA 30 9.7 (2.2–14.4) NR 94.0 8.8 (1.5–25)—burden
Unsal and Resorlu (18) J Pediatr Surg 2011 Turkey 16 4.2 (0.8–7) 9:7 88.0 11.5 [8–17]—burden
Yuruk et al. (19) J Pediatr Urol 2017 Turkey 14 10.9 [7–15] 8:6 100.0 13.6 [10–18]
Baş et al. (20) J Endourol 2016 Turkey 36 8.4 [1–16] 15:21 86.1 12.8 [10–19]
Erkurt et al. (21) Urolithiasis 2014 Turkey 65 4.3 (0.5–7) 31:34 92.3 14.7 [7–30]
Yeow et al. (22) J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2009 Australia 26 8.2 (0.25–15) 14:12 88.5 10.3 [3–21]
Tanaka et al. (23) J Urol 2008 USA 50 7.9 (1.2–13.6) 31:19 58.0 8.8 (1.5–25)
Resorlu et al. (24) J Urol 2012 Turkey 95 9.3 [1–17] 53:42 92.6 14.3 [10–30]
Featherstone et al. (25) J Pediatr Urol 2017 England 17 10.8 (3.9–15) 9:8 88.2 13.3 [10–25]