Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep;11(9):3864–3873. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.15

Table 4. Comparison of PROFILE trials and real world experience.

Clinical studies PROFILE 1005 PROFILE 1007 PROFILE 1014 PROFILE 1029 Current case series
Study design Phase 2, 2nd line Phase 3, 2nd line Phase 3, 1st line Phase 3, 1st line, East Asian Case series, 1st line, 2nd line & beyond
Treatment Crizotinib Crizotinib vs. pemetrexed or docetaxel Crizotinib vs. pemetrexed with cisplatin or carboplatin Crizotinib vs. pemetrexed-cisplatin/carboplatin Crizotinib
ORR 53% 65% vs. 20% (P<0.001) 74% vs. 45% (P<0.001) 88% vs. 46% (P<0.0001) 64%
Median DOR 43 weeks Not given 11.3 vs. 5.3 months 44 vs. 18 weeks (P<0.0001) 34 weeks (8.5 months)
Median PFS 8.5 months 7.7 vs. 3.0 months (HR 0.49, P<0.001) 10.9 vs. 7.0 months (HR 0.45, P<0.001) 11.1 vs. 6.8 months (HR 0.40, P<0.0001) 8 months, overall; 15 months, upfront crizotinib
Median OS Not assessed 20.3 vs. 22.8 months (HR 1.02, P=0.54, NS); median follow up 12 months 45.8 to NR vs. 47.5 to NR months (HR 0.76, P=0.978); median follow up 46 months 28.5 vs. 27.7 months (HR 0.09, P=0.33); median follow up 33 months Not reached (for upfront crizotinib; median follow up 18 months

ORR, higher objective response rates; DOR, duration of response; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; NS, not significant; NR, not reached.