Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 11;19(10):2825–2832. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15350

Table 3.

PRI‐T subgroup analyses

Analysis Number of patients Mean PRI‐T P‐value
All patients 29 (of 512 patients) 10.21 ± 9.06
Gender .70
Male 10 9.30 ± 2.44
Female 19 10.68 ± 9.85
Age (y) .01
35‐<40 3 21.00 ± 14.18
40‐<45 6 14.17 ± 10.05
45‐<50 2 13.00 ± 16.97
50‐<55 4 8.50 ± 4.80
55‐<60 8 6.63 ± 5.90
60‐65 6 5.83 ± 4.49
BMI (kg/m²) .08
<25 9 13.00 ± 10.59
25‐30 15 11.27 ± 8.27
>30 5 2.00 ± 2.12
Side of nephrectomy .32
Left 27 (of 433 procedures) 9.74 ± 8.92
Right 2 (of 79 procedures) 16.50 ± 12.02
Time since surgery (y) .48
0‐<2 9 (of 74 patients) 10.22 ± 9.36
2‐<4 5 (of 96 patients) 8.20 ± 5.72
4‐<6 2 (of 89 patients) 13.50 ± 7.78
6‐<8 5 (of 76 patients) 11.20 ± 12.56
8‐<10 4 (of 84 patients) 16.50 ± 11.33
10‐14 4 (of 93 patients) 3.50 ± 1.00

Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Significant P‐values are in bold.

PRI‐T, total pain rating index (score 0‐63).