Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 14;2019(10):CD009027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009027.pub3

Singhi 2003.

Methods Randomised controlled trial.
Single centre in India.
Total duration of trial 2‐3 years in both comparison groups.
Participants Children with NCC.
Diagnostic criteria based on CT Scan findings, only single lesions included.
55 children treated with AEDs for 1 year as group A, 51 children treated for 2 years as group B.
Age range: 3 to 14 years, 61 boys, 45 girls.
Demographically comparable groups.
Inclusion criteria: children with seizures and CT scan diagnosis of NCC.
Exclusion criteria: children with multiple or calcified CT lesions, static or progressive neurological disorder, any systemic or chronic illness, any clinical or ancillary evidence of tuberculosis;
55% also received albendazole within 3 months of presentation.
Follow‐up: 12 months after drug withdrawal.
Interventions AEDs for 12 months in group A and 24 months in group B.
All children received monotherapy.
80% received carbamazepine, 18% received dilantin.
Formulations, dosage, group‐wise distribution not stated.
Outcomes Seizure recurrence during and after drug withdrawal.
Association of seizure recurrence with clinical variables (type and frequency of seizures).
Association of seizure recurrence with CT and EEG abnormalities.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random sequence tables used for randomisation
Demographic variables of children in both groups comparable
Type and frequency of seizures, AEDs given, EEG and CT Scan observations detailed and comparable
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants and personnel were not blinded to the intervention. Hence, we assume here that they were also not blinded to short or long duration treatment arms.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Withdrawals and reasons not stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol not available, all expected outcomes suitably detailed in the results section
Other bias High risk Dosage of AEDs given not stated