Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 8;8(10):e1625689. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1625689

Table 2.

Comparisons of diagnostic models and protein markers in different cohorts.

Group Variable AUC 95% CI p value
Training Group CEA 0.835 0.772–0.898 0.0081
(n = 158) CA125 0.728 0.649–0.807 <0.0001
  Primary Model 0.897 0.848–0.946 /
  Second Model 0.846 0.785–0.907 0.0061
Validation Group CEA 0.769 0.695–0.842 0.0031
(n = 158) CA125 0.736 0.659–0.813 0.0024
  Primary Model 0.856 0.798–0.914 /
  Second Model 0.797 0.727–0.866 0.0265
Whole Group CEA 0.797 0.749–0.846 0.0005
(n = 316) CA125 0.729 0.674–0.784 <0.0001
  Primary Model 0.866 0.826–0.905 /
  Second Model 0.814 0.768–0.861 0.0025

Abbreviations: CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125 = cancer antigen 125, AUC = area under the curve, 95%CI = 95% Confidence Intervals.