Table 2.
Developing depression assessment method | Exposure | Cases/person-yearsa | Adjustment | 12-month per increase | 60-month per increase | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
Developing depression () | 11,904/310,075 | Model 1b | 1.13 | 1.08, 1.18 | 1.08 | 1.03, 1.14 | |
Model 2c | 1.11 | 1.06, 1.16 | 1.06 | 1.01, 1.11 | |||
2,647/56,719 | Model 1 | 1.01 | 0.83, 1.22 | — | — | ||
Model 2 | 1.01 | 0.83, 1.22 | — | — | |||
Developing depression (doctor’s diagnosis or use of medications) | 1,126/312,334 | Model 1 | 1.21 | 1.02, 1.45 | 1.2 | 1.00, 1.44 | |
Model 2 | 1.21 | 1.01, 1.45 | 1.2 | 1.00, 1.43 | |||
402/56,646 | Model 1 | 0.93 | 0.63, 1.38 | — | — | ||
Model 2 | 0.96 | 0.64, 1.43 | — | — |
Note: Estimates represent HRs (95% CIs) for as a dichotomous outcome. —, data not available; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; , particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of ; , particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of .
Person-years were the total numbers for all subjects and account for missing covariate data. The person-years and number of cases were different between and models because the follow-up for model started on 1 January 2011 and the follow-up for model started on 1 January 2015.
Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, study center, and year of visit.
Model 2 was adjusted as for Model 1 and additionally adjusted for educational level, smoking status, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and physical activity.