Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;127(7):077001. doi: 10.1289/EHP4094

Table 2.

Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for developing depression for a 10-μg/m3 increase in particulate matter air pollution in the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study (KSHS).

Developing depression assessment method Exposure Cases/person-yearsa Adjustment 12-month per 10-μg/m3 increase 60-month per 10-μg/m3 increase
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Developing depression (CES -D16) PM10 11,904/310,075 Model 1b 1.13 1.08, 1.18 1.08 1.03, 1.14
Model 2c 1.11 1.06, 1.16 1.06 1.01, 1.11
PM2.5 2,647/56,719 Model 1 1.01 0.83, 1.22
Model 2 1.01 0.83, 1.22
Developing depression (doctor’s diagnosis or use of medications) PM10 1,126/312,334 Model 1 1.21 1.02, 1.45 1.2 1.00, 1.44
Model 2 1.21 1.01, 1.45 1.2 1.00, 1.43
PM2.5 402/56,646 Model 1 0.93 0.63, 1.38
Model 2 0.96 0.64, 1.43

Note: Estimates represent HRs (95% CIs) for CES -D16 as a dichotomous outcome. —, data not available; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PM10, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10μm; PM2.5, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5μm.

a

Person-years were the total numbers for all subjects and account for missing covariate data. The person-years and number of cases were different between PM10 and PM2.5 models because the follow-up for PM10 model started on 1 January 2011 and the follow-up for PM2.5 model started on 1 January 2015.

b

Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, study center, and year of visit.

c

Model 2 was adjusted as for Model 1 and additionally adjusted for educational level, smoking status, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and physical activity.