Table 1.
Response likelihood for stimuli 69–78
Mutant class | Response Likelihood | ||
---|---|---|---|
mean | SEM | n | |
Control | 0.56 | 0.073 | 41 |
Hk | 0.98** | 0.018 | 11 |
slo | 0.84* | 0.067 | 19 |
Sh133 | 0.65 | 0.122 | 15 |
Sh120 +Sh5 | 0.25* | 0.101 | 17 |
eag | 0.15** | 0.082 | 16 |
Hk Sh | 0.89* | 0.099 | 10 |
Hk eag Sh | 0.80 | 0.200 | 5 |
eag1Sh133 | 0.75 | 0.127 | 10 |
eag1Sh120 | 0.36 | 0.163 | 9 |
rut | 0.76 | 0.066 | 36 |
dnc | 0.26*** | 0.076 | 32 |
dnc rut | 0.17*** | 0.080 | 21 |
In controls, response likelihood crossed 0.5 at stimulus 74 (compare Fig. 2). Response likelihood over the 10 stimuli was calculated for each fly, then averaged for each mutant class, and compared with controls (two-tailed t test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). Except for Sh and eag Sh, different alleles (listed in Materials and Methods) gave similar results and are combined (same trials shown in Fig. 3). Results for learning mutants rut and dnc were calculated from previous trials (Engel and Wu, 1996).