Skip to main content
. 1998 Mar 15;18(6):2254–2267. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-06-02254.1998

Table 1.

Response likelihood for stimuli 69–78

Mutant class Response Likelihood
mean SEM n
Control 0.56 0.073 41
Hk 0.98** 0.018 11
slo 0.84* 0.067 19
Sh133 0.65 0.122 15
Sh120 +Sh5 0.25* 0.101 17
eag 0.15** 0.082 16
Hk Sh 0.89* 0.099 10
Hk eag Sh 0.80 0.200 5
eag1Sh133 0.75 0.127 10
eag1Sh120 0.36 0.163 9
rut 0.76 0.066 36
dnc 0.26*** 0.076 32
dnc rut 0.17*** 0.080 21

In controls, response likelihood crossed 0.5 at stimulus 74 (compare Fig. 2). Response likelihood over the 10 stimuli was calculated for each fly, then averaged for each mutant class, and compared with controls (two-tailed t test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). Except for Sh and eag Sh, different alleles (listed in Materials and Methods) gave similar results and are combined (same trials shown in Fig. 3). Results for learning mutants rut and dnc were calculated from previous trials (Engel and Wu, 1996).