Skip to main content
. 1998 Mar 15;18(6):2009–2016. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-06-02009.1998

Table 1.

Modulation of evoked IPSCs (eIPSCs) and mIPSCs

Agent Amplitude (pA) Latency (msec) Frequency (Hz) n
Control Agent Control Agent Control Agent
eIPSCs
 D1 agonists 89.2  ± 12.3 193.9  ± 35.71-a 3.2  ± 0.2 2.6  ± 0.11-a 13
 Fors 81.2  ± 32.1 273.6  ± 91.5 3.1  ± 0.2 2.6  ± 0.11-a 4
 SCH 113.5  ± 30.8 41.9  ± 10.9 3.2  ± 0.1* 3.3  ± 0.2*1-a 4 (3*)
mIPSCs
 D1 agonists 46.2  ± 10.6 45.7  ± 8.7 2.0  ± 2.0 6.0  ± 6.31-a 9
 Fors 39.7  ± 12.2 40.2  ± 8.6 1.4  ± 0.5 4.4  ± 1.41-a 4
 SCH 41.1  ± 11.4 45.9  ± 11.6 1.0  ± 0.8 1.0  ± 0.7 5

Data are given as mean ± SEM. mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of TTX (0.3 μm) and Cd2+ (20–100 μm). D1 agonists, SKF38393 (3–20 μm) and DA (10 μm + D2antagonist sulpiride 1 μm). Fors, Forskolin (5–20 μm). SCH, D1 antagonist SCH23390 (0.1–1 μm).

F1-a

 p < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s test.

h = 3 for latency measurement.