Table 1.
Channel construct and treatment | Peak current (pA) | Inactivation time constant (msec) | Deactivation time constant (msec) |
---|---|---|---|
Wild-type Kv1.3 (n = 10) | |||
Control | 374 ± 69 | 861 ± 117 | 30 ± 4 |
Pervanadate | 210 ± 40* | 813 ± 73 | 34 ± 9 |
Y449F Kv1.3 (n = 6) | |||
Control | 491 ± 85 | 833 ± 72 | 37 ± 5 |
Pervanadate | 466 ± 79 | 758 ± 79 | 63 ± 24 |
YYY111-113FFF Kv1.3 (n = 4) | |||
Control | 477 ± 120 | 775 ± 83 | 21 ± 4 |
Pervanadate | 408 ± 86 | 677 ± 87 | 14 ± 3 |
Y137F Kv1.3 (n = 8) | |||
Control | 494 ± 134 | 838 ± 113 | 30 ± 3 |
Pervanadate | 214 ± 90* | 521 ± 91* | 12 ± 3* |
Y479F Kv1.3 (n = 5) | |||
Control | 837 ± 252 | 789 ± 161 | 33 ± 7 |
Pervanadate | 533 ± 115* | 683 ± 76 | 25 ± 4 |
Currents were evoked by 1 sec depolarizing pulses to +40 mV. Pervanadate treatment was as described for Figure 7. Values are means ± SEM. Time constant values were estimated from exponential fits to the inactivating or deactivating portion of the current. There were no significant differences (ANOVA) in basal biophysical parameters of the wild-type and mutant channels.
*Pervanadate-treated is significantly different from control by pairedt test.