Skip to main content
. 1998 Dec 1;18(23):10180–10188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10180.1998

Table 2.

Effects of sense, mismatch, and antisense mGluR1 oligonucleotide infusions on different sensory responses of dorsal horn neurons

Stimulus Stimulus-evoked response (Hz)
Normal control Sense reagent-treated Mismatch reagent-treated Antisense reagent-treated
(n = 8) (n = 7) (n = 6) (n = 6)
Innocuous brush 17.2  ± 2.3 22.1  ± 5.7 14.5  ± 2.4 20.4  ± 5.6
Acute chemical nociception 30.7  ± 7.2 22.7  ± 7.7 20.9  ± 3.9 1.4  ± 0.5*
Sustained activity caused by repeated nociceptive stimuli 10.1  ± 2.6 7.4  ± 1.8 7.3  ± 1.6 0.5  ± 1.8*

The sensory responses monitored were the acute neuronal responses to innocuous brush (mean taken over 10 sec) and the chemical algogen mustard oil applied to the peripheral receptive field (mean taken over 10 sec, 20–40 sec after initial application), as well as the sustained sensitized activity caused by repeated application of mustard oil (mean taken over 10 sec, 15–18 min after the first three applications). Basal firing rates of neurons were all within the range 0–1.0 Hz and were no different between treatments. Values are means ± SEM with numbers of neurons in parentheses. *Indicates significantly different from normal, sense, or mismatch reagent controls; p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test.