Skip to main content
. 1998 Nov 1;18(21):8625–8636. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-21-08625.1998

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Analysis of the block by extracellular Ba2+ of wild-type Kir7.1 and mutant Kir7.1M125R inXenopus oocytes. A, Ramp current responses to voltage ramps of 2 sec duration between −150 and +60 mV show the voltage dependence of IKir7.1 block by 1 and 5 mm Ba2+. B, Current inhibition relative to a maximum block by a saturating concentration of Ba2+ is plotted versus the concentration of the blocking cation at a holding potential ofVh = −80 mV. Curves are least-squares fits of data points to a Hill equation (1/1 + [A/Ki]n, giving a Ki for Ba2+ of 670 μm for Kir7.1 (•) and aKi for Ba2+ of 27 μm for Kir7.1M125R (○). Kiis the concentration of cation producing 50% block; Aand n are variables. Insets, Shown are continuous recordings of wild-type and mutant Kir7.1 currents at −80 mV under Ba2+ block. The application of the blocker is indicated by black bars. C, Time- and voltage-dependent block of wild-type and mutant Kir7.1M125R channels by Ba2+. Shown are single-exponential fits to the time course of the current block by a saturating concentration of Ba2+ (10 mm for Kir7.1 and 500 μm for Kir7.1M125R). Insets, Shown are the complete current responses of Kir7.1 and Kir7.1M125R channels to 500 msec voltage steps between 0 and −120 mV. D, Relationship of time constants of activation (τon) and the membrane potential for wild-type Kir7.1 (•) and mutant Kir7.1M125R (○) channels at 96 mm external K+.