Table 1.
Average parameters and results in the four series of experiments
Series | 1 (n = 20) | 2 (n = 14) | 3 (n = 16) | 4 (n = 19) | Total (n = 69) | Exp versus Con Wilcoxon T | Series K–W H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shock (mA) | |||||||
Exp | 5.5 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 723.0NS | 1.69NS |
Con | 5.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 5.0 | ||
Criterion (mm) | |||||||
Exp | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 2.0NS | 1.29NS |
Con | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | ||
First response (s) | |||||||
Exp | 28 | 28 | 40 | 41 | 33 | 10.61* | |
Time above criterion (%) | |||||||
Pre | |||||||
Exp | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1145.5NS | 2.56NS |
Con | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
Phase I training | |||||||
Exp | 92 | 92 | 95 | 94 | 94 | 276.5** | 2.38NS |
Con | 66 | 70 | 80 | 69 | 70 | ||
Phase I extinction | |||||||
Exp | 31 | 29 | 25 | 23 | 29 | 847.5* | 3.47NS |
Con | 17 | 22 | 26 | 14 | 18 | ||
Phase II training | |||||||
Exp | 92 | 94 | 94 | 96 | 94 | 795.5* | 3.02NS |
Con | 75 | 84 | 94 | 95 | 88 | ||
Phase II extinction | |||||||
Exp | 22 | 19 | 14 | 31 | 19 | 692.0** | 1.65NS |
Con | 11 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 12 | ||
Spontaneous contractions (s) | |||||||
Pre | |||||||
Exp | 34 | 108 | 101 | 29 | 65 | 1081.5NS | 6.53NS |
Con | 60 | 99 | 78 | 39 | 63 | ||
First extinction | |||||||
Exp | 127 | 168 | 106 | 77 | 106 | 875.0* | 7.69NS |
Con | 84 | 78 | 107 | 69 | 79 | ||
Last extinction | |||||||
Exp | 65 | 104 | 60 | 70 | 69 | 1015.5NS | 4.99NS |
Con | 62 | 82 | 57 | 72 | 71 | ||
Baseline shift (mm) | |||||||
Pre | |||||||
Exp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 812.0NS | 4.07NS |
Con | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
First extinction | |||||||
Exp | 1.41 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.62 | 842.5NS | 1.96NS |
Con | 0.94 | 0.31 | 1.09 | 0.62 | 0.62 | ||
Last extinction | |||||||
Exp | 1.72 | 0.31 | 0.62 | 1.56 | 0.94 | 604.5* | 1.06NS |
Con | 0.47 | −0.16 | 0.16 | 0.62 | 0.31 |
Median values of the parameters and results in the four series of experiments (see Materials and Methods) and overall are shown. The experimental and control animals were compared by Wilcoxon’s signed-ranks tests (T), and the four series of experiments were compared by Kruskal–Wallis ANOVAs (K–W H). Exp, Experimental; Con, control; Pre, pretest period.
*p < 0.05;
**p < 0.01;
NS, not significant.