Table 2. Summary of rodent trapping data and the Bartonella ssrA and gltA genotypes detected in trapped rodents by village around Moshi, Tanzania.

Village code	District	Total number of rodents tested for Bartonella	Adjusted trap success [29]	Bartonella genotypes identified, with data on the number of individuals and rodent species each genotype was detected in
				ssrA genotypes	gltA genotypes
A	Rural	12	9.79	1s–2 * Rattus rattus	3g–2 * Rattus rattus
B	Rural	13	4.28	7s–1 * Rattus rattus 10s–1 * Rattus rattus	-
C	Municipal	31	4.77	10s–1 * Rattus rattus	1g–1 * Rattus rattus
D	Municipal	25	2.68	10s–1 * Rattus rattus 2s–1 * Paraxerus flavovittis	1g–1 * Rattus rattus
E	Rural	39	5.28	4s–1 * Rattus rattus 10s–2 * Rattus rattus	1g–1 * Rattus rattus 3g–1 * Rattus rattus
F	Municipal	76	10.8	1s–5 * Rattus rattus 9s–1 * Rattus rattus 10s–1 * Rattus rattus 11s–5 * Rattus rattus	1g–1 * Rattus rattus 3g–3 * Rattus rattus
F (visit 2)	Municipal	33	4.42	1s–1 * Rattus rattus 11s–3 * Rattus rattus
G	Rural	15	1.94	6s–1 * M. natalensis	3g–1 * M. natalensis
H	Rural	35	4.69	1s–1 * Rattus rattus 5s–5 * Rattus rattus 8s–1 * Rattus rattus 10s–3 * Rattus rattus	1g–2 * Rattus rattus 3g–1 * Rattus rattus
J	Rural	19	2.70	10s–4 * Rattus rattus	2g–1 * Rattus rattus
K	Municipal	23	3.19	10s–1 * Rattus rattus	-
L	Rural	22	2.93	1s–2 * Rattus rattus 10s–3 * Rattus rattus	1g–2 * Rattus rattus
M	Municipal	38	5.06	3s–1 * Rattus rattus

Village codes correspond to village locations indicated in Fig 1. Distinct ssrA and gltA genotypes are identified by a sequential number and “s” or “g” respectively. Data on trap success are as reported in [29]