Table 1.
Method | Noise Level | ||
---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | |
Zero-Fill from 32x32 | 1.109 | 1.652 | 4.505 |
Bicubic from 32x32 | 2.794 | 3.129 | 3.820 |
16x16 D-UNet | 1.863 | 2.420 | 2.761 |
24x24 D-UNet | 1.139 | 1.316 | 1.745 |
32x32 D-UNet | 0.7460 | 0.9722 | 1.599 |
These values are the total sum of the mean squared error over 169 test subjects. The 32x32 D-UNet reconstruction outperforms all of the other methods. With higher random noise present in the LRSI, the 16x16 and 24x24 D-UNets outperform both zero-filling and bicubic interpolation. It is important to note that this is true even though the zero-filling and bicubic interpolation methods are applied to a 32x32 image. Bold values indicate the method with the lowest mean squared error for each comparison.