Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 9;9:1010. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01010

Table 1.

The mean squared error between the high resolution ground truth (HRSI) and several methods are tabulated.

Method Noise Level
Low Medium High
Zero-Fill from 32x32 1.109 1.652 4.505
Bicubic from 32x32 2.794 3.129 3.820
16x16 D-UNet 1.863 2.420 2.761
24x24 D-UNet 1.139 1.316 1.745
32x32 D-UNet 0.7460 0.9722 1.599

These values are the total sum of the mean squared error over 169 test subjects. The 32x32 D-UNet reconstruction outperforms all of the other methods. With higher random noise present in the LRSI, the 16x16 and 24x24 D-UNets outperform both zero-filling and bicubic interpolation. It is important to note that this is true even though the zero-filling and bicubic interpolation methods are applied to a 32x32 image. Bold values indicate the method with the lowest mean squared error for each comparison.